




the long-winded narratives of a mildly violent mind back in college
Econ101 had us photocopying several chapters of the Mankiw textbook for our discussions. Recently, Father required us to write a ten-page argumentative research paper on the implementation or repeal of EVAT.
Philo102 also had us photocopying articles in the Philisophy of Man book and writing reaction papers on philosophical writings. I didn't really like his class. He's sort of a religious man. So on the lesson on the dualistic notion of man, he always talked about God. I don't like it. So I think I am going to write about the article 'Death of God' for my second-quarter reaction paper. }:-)
Lit103 again required a photocopy of each story, which she excellently read to us by the way. So far she's the best Literature teacher I've had because she didn't have us write literary pieces. Too bad she can't see how good I am in 'hatred poetry.' She honestly said she hates writing. That may not make her the perfect Literature teacher. But she's really good at interpreting and analyzing the stories we read. So she made us understand and appreciate seemingly incomprehensible literary works, like 'Dead Stars.' Now we are about to write a paper on a 23-page hand-out, which is actually a book. More paper will be taken from us. But at least we don't have a final exam.
Math232 again had us photocopied two chapters on probability. But they were useless! Our math teacher has been neglecting us, expecting that we can and would rather study on our own because we were CS and Engineering students. How discriminatory! I think we only had one serious meeting with him. I don't think it was even really serious, because on that period alone , he attempted to discuss the whole chapter two! "This is the fastest lesson ever..." I remember him commenting in the middle of the "discussion" that night. I barely learned from him. Actually, I learned more from my classmate who had innate math powers. When the teacher showed me my shocking midterm grade, I was puzzled yet delighted. A few days later, he made an offer. If we choose not to take the second quarter, that's fine with him as long as we agree that our midterm grade will be our final grade! It's unbelievable! I accepted it even though I felt uncomfortable. I mean, when people will see my final grade for 'Math 232: Probability and Statistics', they might say, "Wow that's impressive. You must be excellent in advanced probability and statistics that requires a strong background in integral calculus!!" when in fact I only learned basic probability that I will surely forget about next month. I am so guilty. But that's life. Unfair. And this time, I'm on the lucky side. ^_^
CS 215 photocopies were about explanation of the structure of programming languages and how they work. We were also assigned a research from the beginning of the sem with a 20-30 page written report. More paper!
The worst is CS311! Aside from the photocopies on how to make DFDs, our group has just passed half-a-rim sheets of bond paper and they were only DFDs with redundant Data Descriptions! Now we are about to pass the whole documentation, which we expect to be thicker! OK, now I know why it would be hardbound.
I have so much to work on today. No time for procrastination! Yet I am still here wasting my time on blogging. At least I'm getting a break. I need one right now. We have to finish a 10-page research paper on Economics, make stupid DFDs and make a presentation report of them, finish up a 20-30-page documentation on a pragramming language with mobile computing capabilities and also make a presentation of it. All are due within the next two weeks. We have to deal with all of them altogether. These days are hell days for me.
On other news, I have downloaded a PDF file of Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. I have read the first few parts. And it sucks! No, not the story. It's the way I read. I hate reading monitors. Not good for the eyes. And I have to turn on the PC just to read. I was thinking of borrowing a book, but that means dealing with a long line of fellow borrowers. And patience is not my virtue.
So why did I resort to this desperate measure? I don't want the story to be gradually narrated to me by spoilers! First, a website reviews that the book has a really gloomy plot. So that means there are deaths of those close to Harry. That's a spoiler. Hey, why did I even read the book review? Stupid me. Then there was one who surprised me with the news that Dumbledore died! I was shocked - and furious. Then another one repeated the news and added that Snape really is a villain and a traitor! *screaming* I have to finish the book soon.
I really have to stop this. I have lots of function description tables to fill up.
Dammit!
Last week was horrible! I had tonsilitis with fever. Swallowing really hurt. I can't enjoy eating. My face frowned at every gulp. The warm salt solution meagrely relieved the soreness. I can't drink cold liquid, which I miss right now. I had a fever (that I exaggeratedly thought was dengue), which surprisingly lasted for two days. I even had a singaw where my wisdom tooth is struggling to grow.
I decided to consult the doctor in the school clinic last Saturday. He wasn't there. How could I think that that grumpy old doctor would be patient enough to serve the students on a Saturday? I instead headed to a pharmacy to buy 10 capsules of Amoxicillin, as my father told me. He strongly advised to consult a doctor. He wasn't sure if I really had tonsilitis because he couldn't see deeper into my throat and look for swellings. What if a fish bone was just stuck in my throat? I assured him it was really tonsilitis. If it was the latter, a fish bone would give a sharper pain. So today, the soreness is subsiding. But I still can't drink (or even eat, I think) something cold. Shit!
We were also required to attend this CSIT Awarding Ceremony last Saturday from four to eight. I went in the gym 'round 4:30. The first contest was the vocal solo singing. The representative for our subdepartment sang the ever-popular 'Especially for You'. And guess what? The only lyrics she was sure of were: "Especially for you", "I wanna let you know", "Together, together, I wanna show you my heart is SO SO true. And all the love I have is especially for you." I don't want to offend her here. I believed she was forced to sing. She had a nice voice but she should've refused, especially when she hasn't memorized the lyrics well.
Now that surprises me. I mean, right now everyone is singing this mushy song. Even the corrupt witchy fat lady in the advanced com lab keeps on playing it in the computer unit, which she thinks is hers. Imagine the Windows Media Player with only 'Especially for You' in the playlist and the play setting on 'Repeat'! We've got a room that haunts the computer users with the same song that will keep on playing in their minds even when they are out of the com lab. It's like a curse! I shall accuse her of witchery and burn her at stake like a pig!
My God, I hope she won't see this...
OK. Fully charged na ang cel ko...
From Bernie:
***************
I was planning to kill the most LOVELY and the most CHARMING person on earth
then I realized...
that would be SUICIDE!
bad yun...
***************
As I watched the ants crawl upon the wall, I noticed that no matter how busy they are, they still stop and communicate. I hope we could be like the ants...
nga makalakawlakaw sa walls!
***************
Last night I dreamed of U.
This morning my first thought was U.
I'm thinking of U right now
And till I go to bed tonight.
Bukas I'll think of letter V naman...
tapos W, X, Y, Z.
***************
Ang tunay na kacutetan ng isang tao
Ay di makikita sa panlabas na anyo
O pisikal na atraksyon.
Dahil ang tunay na kacutetan ay nasa...
AKIN lamang.
Sige may konti sa 'yo.
Konti lang ha?
***************
From Jame:
***************
English-Tagalog dictionary:
PERSUADING = unang kasal
DEVASTATION = stasyon ng bus
PROTESTANT = tindahan ng prutas
STATUE = ikaw ba yan?
PREDICATE = pakawalan ang pusa
***************
ENGLISH CLASS
Bawal ang mag-Tagalog...
Pedro: Maam, may I go out?
Teacher: Why?
Pedro: Because FATHER MOTHER ME
Teacher: What?
Pedro:
***************
How many animals can you fit in a pair of pants?
Answer: one cock, two bulls and a thousand of hares
In a panty?
Answer: Just one smiling pussy...
***************
Paano if one day
Sabi ni Doc
You need new legs
Or else you'll die?
Nagpaopera ka
Nang matapos, ask you
Sino donor?
May inabot na note, sabi:
Ingatan mo alaala ko.
Love,
DAGUL
***************
Want to hear a fairy tale?
Once upon a time, Cinderella was so horny.
So she put Pinocchio's nose between her legs and shouted:
"Lie to me bastard, lie!"
The End
***************
Nakakatakot ang buhay.
Di natin alam kung kelan tayo mamatay.
Di rin natin alam kung lahat ba ng kaibigan natin ay maaasahan.
Pero ang higit kong kinatatakutan ay
'Pag nagbackless si Imang.
***************
From Ice:
***************
FRENCH LESSON:
cough = o vou
ashes = a vou
naked = hu vou
car = re vou
balloon = lo vou
drugs = sha vou
goodbye = va vou
CUTE = a cou! Lagi na lang a cou!
***************
Sabi nila:
SUNGIT ka, nagalit ako.
Wala ka daw KUWENTA, sinapak ko.
Wala kang TASTE, sinuntok ko nga.
Nang sinabing CUTE ka, binaril ko na.
Nanloloko na eh!
***************
From ?
***************
Wife puts Viagra on husband's coffee to add sex drive. After drinking, husband grabbed and fucked her on the table. Wife shout and cried, "'Tang ina naman, 'wag naman dito sa Jollibee!"
***************
SEXY: Maawa ka! Meron ako, meron ako!
RAPIST: AHH! Walang meron-meron sa akin! TITIKMAN KITAA!
SEXY: WAG! AYY!
RAPIST: Yaakkk!!! Meron ka nga! MERON KANG ITLOG, BAKLA!
***************
Anong bagay ang mahaba..
'Pag nagagalit, tumataba!
'Pag hinihimas humahaba!
Nakapagpapasaya sa mga babae...
Ano pa e di...
titi!
'Kala mo joke noh!
Di na uso yun!
***************
*Ayan yan lang ang matype ko. Nakakapagod pala. Yung si ? di ko kilala, kaya nga ? ang name ng number nya sa cel ko. Nagtext ako sa kanya para itanong kung sino siya. Pero nagreply siya na nagtatanong rin kung sino ako. Hindi ko muna sinabi sa kanya kasi ako una nagtanong. Pero makulit siya! Nabuwisit ako kaya nagreply ako ng "Bahala ka!" Pinapahirapan lang namin ang mga sarili namin...
Hindi muna ako magsusulat tungkol sa Nature Appreciation. Yung previous post ko introduction pa lang pero detalyado na. Kaya dapat detalyado rin ang Nature Appreciation Part 2. Hirap pala! Hindi naman ako magaling magsulat ng kuwento. But I'll take it as a challenge.
Dahil magpopost ako ng tungkol sa isang contemporary Filipino culture, Filipino muna gamitin ko. Pero informal lang. Mahirap magsulat sa purong Filipino.
Kagabi kasi maraming bumabagabag sa akin. Medyo hindi ako makatulog. Ayokong sabihin ang mga dahilan dito kasi ayokong maalala sila kung babasahin ko man ulit ang posts ko sa hinaharap. Bad mood ako kagabi so kinuha ko cel ko at nagbasa ng messages sa inbox ko. Alam ko kasi na karamihan sa hindi ko ibinura ay mga jokes, tapos karamihan pa sa kanila napakagreen. Kaya masaya!
Punyeta! Namatay cellphone ko! Empty batt na! Ikopya ko sana dito yung mga text jokes, pero wala nang pag-asa. At least for now. Ituloy ko na lang 'to bukas. Nasa school pa kasi ako at wala akong charger.
Lintik na pagkakataon 'to!
This year’s Nature Appreciation venue is Tolosa, Guisao. Sounds very far-flung to me. So I wasn’t surprised to see splashing water and a lot of green all around. But before getting there, there were… unfortunate events. Unfortunate, but worthwhile.
After eating a hurried breakfast, I fixed myself one more time and rushed to Nonong Store. It was around 7:40 A.M. I expected them to stop there soon. The scheduled departure time at school is 7 A.M. It’s a 30-minute ride from the civilized city proper to Divisoria. But since the ACILians are hopelessly Filipino, I expected them to leave a little late. And I was wrong.
Growing impatient as well as anxious, I headed back home. I forced a missed call on Ate Mich’s cell phone. After a few minutes, I received a message from her that said something like, “Hintay lang J. Magdispose pa sa amin si Bro. Ogie. Miss call lang kita.” “WHAT?!” I thought. It was past eight and they’re still in school! Very Filipino! I should’ve expected much more. But that was better instead of departing early, leaving me behind.
And off we went to Tolosa.
*to be continued
Before the midterms, we were asked to submit a reaction paper or book review in our Philosophy of Man class. An article that caught my attention was "Martin Heidegger's Phenomenology of Death." At least the title made me grab the book because I thought it would satisfy my search for the true meaning of death and everything after it. But it was disappointing. I expressed it in my paper. However, the article was still worth reading. I didn't believe in destiny or fate. But now I realize that every one of us is destined... to die. I knew that all of us will eventually die. I just didn't see it as destiny...
If you don’t like the word death, then don’t read this. I have mentioned death several times throughout the article. I started writing this just a few days before the deadline. I procrastinate sometimes.
MARTIN HEIDEGGER’S PHENOMENOLOGY OF DEATH
Jan Carlo Tuclaud
BSCS – 3
Philosophy 102
August 22, 2005
Martin Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Death is written by Manuel B. Dy, Jr. The article is published in the same author’s book Philosophy of Man in page 253.
Dy explains in the article about death as how Martin Heidegger defines it through the phenomenological method. It does not talk about the concept of afterlife but rather about how man usually perceives – and how man should perceive – death.
So what is death according to Heidegger? Before explaining his phenomenology of death, Dy starts defining confusing terms like Dasein, Care, ahead-of-itself, and other simple words that were put together with hyphens to represent some other complex concept. I have however understood one essential term – being-towards-death, which refers to man and his attitude towards death. I will further talk about this later.
Heidegger argues that death should not be defined on the basis of the life after it, if there is. As Dy says in the article, “No one has ever come out alive from death to tell us about death.” I was disappointed at this. I have a lot of questions about the afterlife so I was expecting this article answers them. Nevertheless, I do agree with the author. How will we describe the phase from the point of death to everything after it? There are religious beliefs, each painting a picture of life after death. Who preached these ideas? The prophets. They are dead now. However, they never experienced death when they were still preaching. How can they be sure of the afterlife they believe? For all we know, the prophets could have fooled us. Besides, phenomenology is a process of attempting to disclose the reality of a subject, which in this case is death.
Heidegger tried to describe death from the point of view of a living man. He sought real and existing experiences to aid him in phenomenology. So again, what is death for Heidegger?
Death is man’s transition between his existence and non-existence. Such transition, according to Heidegger, cannot be experienced. Personally, this might not be entirely true. If there really is an afterlife, then man, or at least his consciousness, continues to experience. However, the afterlife experience cannot be relayed to the living world. Afterlife events stay in the afterlife world because the dead cannot return to life. There is this concept of ‘ghost,’ which stands on the foundation of the dualistic notion of man. But this body-and-soul notion is just a theory, an unproven idea. Therefore everything related to this concept, including the existence of ghosts, is unproven. I have heard accounts of people dying and then waking up after a few days. Unbelievable! The ‘resurrected’ might have just been on comatose or something. Even if he was proven to be dead, no heartbeat and all, I’m still skeptic. I don’t give in to superficial miracles. Somehow, there must be a reasonable explanation. Whether there is an afterlife or none, what truly happens on death and after it is beyond the scope of the living man’s knowledge.
Heidegger claims that death is not something that happens but something impending. It is part of one’s existence. It is part of man’s nature. I believe that. Immortality is impossible. Death will never fail to perform its job in every living thing. In every man, death awaits. As Heidegger says, death makes the man complete. In dying, man is proven to be man – a mortal who existed. Death is not the enemy of man. It is his destiny; his fulfillment; his wholeness. Once the man exists at birth, he immediately starts his journey to death. Heidegger’s phenomenology of death is about man as a being-towards-death.
Heidegger asserts that man should be aware of all his potentialities an existing being, as a being-in-the-world. One of these potentialities is the loss of his own existence, which is death. So it is important for man not to be too absorbed as a being-in-the-world.
A being-towards-death attitude though is not always proper. Heidegger observed that there is ‘inauthentic’ being-towards-death. This kind of man sees death as something general instead of taking it personally. He will say something like, “People die… one of these days one will die too, in the end; but right now, it has nothing to do with us.” Such attitude does not accept that death can come anytime, like the next minute. In personal experience, I go about doing things as if my tomorrow will always come. I say, “Bukas ko na lang ‘to gawin.” But what if I die before bukas comes? Then I have just made a plan which I have not and cannot be fulfilled.
Dy mentions that the inauthentic being-towards-death is aware of the possibility of death. However he looks at the death of a ‘one,’ which is actually nobody. He evades the possibility of his own death being near. He thinks that thinking about death is weakness. But for me, the denial of the spontaneity of death is true weakness and cowardice. The inauthentic being-towards-death instead busies himself with everyday matters.
Now the authentic being-towards-death is the man who anticipates death. Man should embrace the indefiniteness of this possibility. In accepting this possibility, “man frees himself,” as the article says. It means that he is freed from the false perception of the inauthentic being-towards-death – that his own death would not come soon. The authentic being-towards-death understands his wholeness with the possibility of death. In personal reflection, this attitude makes man act as if it is his last day. It doesn’t mean that he would prepare for his burial or write his last will. The man aware of the unpredictability of dying would most likely be less covetous with the material world. So what if I lost my job, was embarrassed, or got robbed? These events are futile after death. The authentic being-towards-death does not mean irresponsibility or carelessness. It just makes man take things more lightly as he lives. This way, he wouldn’t be too focused and disturbed with his temporal existence.
Death grants man the insight of the significance of his every action. If he can die anytime, then that means any of his actions can be his last action. This is an important thought for people of religion. It is usually the last action of the living man that determines his judgment in the afterlife. Grasping the possibility of death motivates man to always make the right move as much as possible.